TABLE 2.
Lateral Meniscal Root Injury (n = 46) |
Medial Meniscal Root Injury (n = 9) |
P Valueb | |
---|---|---|---|
Mechanism of injury | |||
Noncontact | 38 (82.6) | 1 (11.1) | .001 |
Contact | 7 (15.2) | 6 (66.7) | |
High energy | 1 (2.2) | 2 (22.2) | |
Associated injuries | |||
None | 1 (2.2) | 3 (33.3) | |
Anterior cruciate ligament tear | 39 (84.8) | 2 (22.2) | <.001 |
Multiligament knee injury | 1 (2.2) | 3 (33.3) | |
Tibial spine | 1 (2.2) | 1 (11.1) | |
Anterior cruciate ligament graft tear | 4 (8.7) | 0 (0) | |
Primary chondral injury | |||
None | 17 (37) | 7 (77.8) | .3895 |
Lateral femoral condyle | 16 (34.8) | 1 (11.1) | |
Medial femoral condyle | 10 (21.7) | 1 (11.1) | |
Lateral tibial plateau | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Medial tibial plateau | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0) | |
Patella | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0) | |
Trochlea | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0) | |
Multiple chondral injuries | 18 (39.1) | 0 (0) | .0232 |
aResults are reported as n (%). The 3 patients with bicondylar root tears are excluded from this analysis.
bStatistical significance of comparison between the groups was noted when P < .05 (boldface).