Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;32(4):543–573. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9378-0

Table 5.

Cross-level interactions on the total sample (n = 29,332), separately included in the model

No contraception Traditional contraception
Models 1–5ab Models 1–5ab
OR OR
1 Readiness
Not wanting children 0.742 *** 0.907 ***
Part-time 1.004 0.994
Not wanting children × part-time 0.996 *** 0.997 *
2 Perceived cost of children 0.737 *** 0.968
Part-time 1.002 0.990 *
Perceived cost of children × part-time 0.995 *** 0.995 *
3 Ability
Educational level
 Studying 0.725 *** 0.744 ***
 Low 1.629 *** 1.387 **
 Middle 1.180 *** 1.093 ***
Ratio income 0.991 *** 0.990 **
Educational level × ratio income
 Studying 0.996 0.990
 Low 1.006 * 1.004
 Middle 1.001 1.004 *
4 Educational level
 Studying 0.736 *** 0.768 **
 Low 1.646 *** 1.316 ***
 Middle 1.181 *** 1.050
Women in politics 0.995 0.987 *
Educational level × women in politics
 Studying 0.998 1.011
 Low 0.990 *** 0.990 **
 Middle 0.998 0.993 **
5 Urban residence 0.891 *** 0.901 ***
Women in politics 0.989 ** 0.972 ***
Urban residence × women in politics 1.005 ** 1.007 **

*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05

aControlled for gender, age, age squared, number of children, marital status, wanting children, perceived cost of children, family values, religiosity, educational level, employment status, income level, residence, % part-time workers, % religious, ratio of female to male income, and % women in regional politics

bEach interaction term is included separately; five different models are displayed. Each model contains the same micro- and macro-level variables, only the interaction term differs