Table 3. Citation percentage of the criteria used by the Carão community, northeastern Brazil, that justify the overlapping use of modern medicine and medicinal plants in the same treatment.
Criteria | Criteria meaning based on the information provided by the participants in the research | Number of citations | % |
---|---|---|---|
Ensure healing | The combination ensures the expected effect, because if one of the treatments fails, the other can work. | 164 | 54 |
Synergistic effect | The addition of treatments accelerates healing. | 38 | 12 |
Availability | Any of the treatments can be used, either together or separately, depending only on the availability of the plant and/or the modern medicines during the disease event. | 25 | 8 |
Local indication | The use of the medicinal plant is advised by someone in the community, but the participant continues to use modern medicine because he or she considers it more effective. | 25 | 8 |
Use of modern medicines at critical times | The plant is the most used treatment for the disease; however, in the worst cases, modern medicine is used in combination. | 16 | 5 |
Experimentation | The combination of treatments is considered an efficiency test of the treatments to choose the best one to use in a future disease event. | 14 | 5 |
Plant as a prophylactic | The plant is used to prevent disease. When a participant is affected by the disease, he or she begins to use modern medicine but continues to use the plant. | 12 | 4 |
Medical indication | The use of modern medicine follows a doctor appointment, but the participant continues to use the plant because the medicinal plant is considered more effective. | 9 | 3 |
Use of medicinal plants at critical times | Modern medicine is the most used treatment for the disease; however, in the worst cases, a medicinal plant is used in combination. | 2 | 1 |
Total | 305 | 100 |
Criteria: were generated by the researcher interpretations of the information provided by the participants during the interviews.