. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Fam Community Health. 2019 Jan-Mar;42(1):30–43. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000209

Table 3.

Mediators of the Effect of the Intervention on Sexual Peer Pressure Communication

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3		Reduction of Intervention Effect on Communication (%)	Cohen’sd^† for Reduction of Intervention Effect on Communication
Mediator	Effect^* of Intervention on Communication Without Controlling for Mediator	Effect^* of Intervention on Mediator	Effect^** of Mediator on Communication	Effect^* of Intervention on Communication Controlling for Mediator	Reduction of Intervention Effect on Communication (%)
Self-Efficacy	.0167 (.0081) p = .0393	.0110 (.0056) p = .0494	.1577 (0.0272) p <. 0001	.0151 (.0080) p = .0614	.0016 (10%)	.20
Sexual Communication Attitudes	.0167 (.0081) p = .0393	.0074 (.0033) p = .0266	.3556 (.0525) p < .0001	.0146 (.0080) p = .0679	.0021 (13%)	.26
Subjective Norms	.0167 (.0081) p = .0393	.0126 (.0056) p = .0255	.1491 (.0313) p < .0001	.0153 (.0080) p = .0574	.0014 (8%)	.17

Note. Table covers all time points; [Estimate (Standard Error)]

Group x Time interaction effect

^**

Main effect of mediator

^†

Small (0-.30), Medium (.30-.60), Large (>.60)