Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2017 Mar 29;113(523):1112–1121. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1305274

Table 1.

Comparison of three estimators of the marginal proximal treatment effect, β̂1, when an important moderator is omitted.

Weighted and Centered GEE-IND GEE-AR(1)



β11
Mean SD RMSE CP Mean SD RMSE CP Mean SD RMSE CP
0.2 −0.20 0.08 0.08 0.96 −0.17 0.07 0.07 0.94 −0.16 0.04 0.06 0.86
0.5 −0.20 0.08 0.08 0.95 −0.14 0.07 0.09 0.88 −0.13 0.05 0.09 0.70
0.8 −0.20 0.08 0.08 0.95 −0.10 0.07 0.12 0.78 −0.10 0.05 0.12 0.57

RMSE, root mean squared error and SD, standard deviation of β̂1; CP, 95% confidence interval coverage probability for β1=0.2. Results are based on 1000 replicates with n = T = 30. Boldface indicates whether Mean or CP are significantly different, at the 5% level, from −0.2 or 0.95, respectively. GEE-IND is the same as the proposed method but with Wt = 1 and no centering. In GEE-AR(1) includes an AR(1) working correlation matrix.