Table 1.
Weighted and Centered | GEE-IND | GEE-AR(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Mean | SD | RMSE | CP | Mean | SD | RMSE | CP | Mean | SD | RMSE | CP | |
0.2 | −0.20 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.96 | −0.17 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.94 | −0.16 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.86 | |
0.5 | −0.20 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.95 | −0.14 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.88 | −0.13 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.70 | |
0.8 | −0.20 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.95 | −0.10 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.78 | −0.10 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.57 |
RMSE, root mean squared error and SD, standard deviation of β̂1; CP, 95% confidence interval coverage probability for . Results are based on 1000 replicates with n = T = 30. Boldface indicates whether Mean or CP are significantly different, at the 5% level, from −0.2 or 0.95, respectively. GEE-IND is the same as the proposed method but with Wt = 1 and no centering. In GEE-AR(1) includes an AR(1) working correlation matrix.