Skip to main content
Innovation in Aging logoLink to Innovation in Aging
. 2017 Jun 30;1(Suppl 1):215. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx004.807

DIETARY PATTERNS AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER MEN IN HONG KONG AND THE U.S.

J Woo 1,2,5, R Chan 1,2, J Leung 3, J Shikany 4
PMCID: PMC6242566

Abstract

Dietary pattern analysis is an alternative approach investigating the association between diet and atherosclerosis. This study examined the association of dietary patterns with prevalent atherosclerosis in community-dwelling men older than 65 years. We used data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Hong Kong (HK) cohort (N=1768) and MrOS US cohort (N=5006). Diet was assessed with country-specific food frequency questionnaire. Principal component analysis identified three a posterior dietary patterns: “vegetables-fruits dominated”, “dim sum-meat-fish dominated”, and “fast foods dominated” in HK site and two patterns: “vegetables-fruits-fish-poultry dominated” and “fast foods-red meat dominated” in US site. Ankle–brachial index (ABI) was measured and a cut-off value of <0.9 was used to define prevalent atherosclerosis. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between dietary patterns and ABI controlling for demographic, socio-demographic and lifestyle variables, and comorbidities. There were 5% and 6.2% MrOS HK and US men with ABI <0.9 respectively (p=0.06). In HK site, men in the highest quartile of “vegetables-fruits dominated” pattern score [age and BMI adjusted OR=0.50 (95% CI: 0.26–0.96), ptrend=0.03] showed lower likelihood of having an ABI <0.9 compared to men in the lowest quartile. In US site, men in the higher quartile of “vegetables-fruits-fish-poultry dominated” pattern score was associated with lower odds of having an ABI <0.9 [age and BMI adjusted OR=0.59 (95% CI: 0.42–0.83), ptrend=0.005]. The associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant in the fully adjusted models. There was no statistically significant association between other pattern scores and ABI category in either cohort.


Articles from Innovation in Aging are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES