Table 2.
Program Name | Target Audience | Program Description | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
School-based programs |
|
|
|
Good Behavior Game | Early elementary grades | Classroom-centered universal prevention program delivered by teachers in classrooms. | Shown to have short- and long-term positive effects on problem behaviors, conduct disorder, educational outcomes, substance use, and violence.29-32 |
Life Skills Training | Students in kindergarten through 12th grade, students in transition, and parents | Substance abuse prevention program that builds knowledge about the dangers of drug use and promotes healthy alternatives through personal self-management skills, general social skills, and drug and violence resistance skills. | Reduced tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use and reduced verbal and physical aggression and delinquency for intervention participants relative to controls.33
Produced $50 benefit for every $1 invested in terms of reduced corrections costs, welfare and social services burden, drug and mental health treatment, and increased employment and tax revenue.34 |
Family-centered programs | |||
Strengthening Families | High-risk families with children in preschool through age 17 | 14-session evidence-based program that provides parent, child, and family with life skills training. Parents and children participate in groups together and separately. |
Various randomized controlled trials evaluating the program reported positive results in reducing substance use and delinquency by improving family relationships.35,36 |
Triple P: Positive Parenting Program | Parents of children up to age 17, specialized programs for parents of children with disabilities, family issues (separation/divorce), minority populations | Parenting program designed to address behavioral and emotional problems in children and teens. Based on social learning, cognitive behavioral theory, and developmental theory. |
Shown to reduce rates of child abuse, reduce foster care placements, and decrease hospitalizations from child abuse injuries.37
Reduced problems in children and improved parental well-being and parenting skills.38 |
Community-based programs | |||
Communities That Care (CTC) | Young people in grades 5 through 12 in participating communities |
CTC is a coalition-based prevention approach in which researchers consult with community stakeholders to identify relevant risk and protective factors and implement evidence-based school, family, and community preventive interventions to promote positive youth development. | Multiple large-scale impact evaluations have found that CTC reduces short- and long-term substance use and delinquent behaviors.39-41
CTC was also found to increase youth-reported protective factors42 and to be a cost-beneficial intervention with a return of $5.30 per $1 invested under conservative assumptions.43 |
PROSPER (PROmoting School-Community Partnerships to Enhance Resilience) | Young people through 12th grade | PROSPER is a community-university partnership that delivers evidence-based school-, family-, and community-based preventive interventions with the primary goal of preventing substance misuse. | Lower substance misuse was seen in intervention youth (relative reduction rates up to approximately 31%)44 as well as reduced conduct problems45 through 6.5 years after baseline. Long-term effects, beyond high school, were observed on reducing substance misuse.40
|
aDisconnected (or opportunity) youth are teenagers and young adults aged 16-24 who are neither in school nor employed.2
Note: Additional evidence-based and promising prevention and reengagement programs can be found at the following websites: https://www.oasas.ny.gov/prevention/evidence/EBPSList.cfm, https://youth.gov/evidence-innovation/program-directory?keywords=&field_pd_factors_risks_tid=413&field_pd_factors_protective_tid=All, http://goc.maryland.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/10/Program-Models-for-Serving-Opportunity-Youth.pdf