Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;118(12):2551–2562. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3980-2

Table 4.

Effects of exercise compared with no-exercise control on CGM-derived glycaemic parameters

Variable CON ANOVA Exercise condition
REHIT MICT HIIT
Mean ± SD Main effect (p) Mean ± SD ∆ (95%CI) Mean ± SD ∆ (95%CI) Mean ± SD ∆ (95%CI)
24-h mean glucose 8.11 ± 1.05 0.05 7.53 ± 0.87 − 0.58 (− 0.16, − 0.99)* 7.74 ± 1.10 − 0.37 (0.04, − 0.78) 7.74 ± 0.59 − 0.37 (0.22, − 0.96)
24- h iAUC (mmol/L/24 h) 1340 ± 554 0.02 1044 ± 541 − 296 (102, − 694) 846 ± 516 − 494 (− 66, − 922)* 976 ± 406 − 364 (127, − 855)
Time ≥ 9 mmol/L (min) 353 ± 211 0.04 241 ± 190 − 112 (− 43, − 181)* 238 ± 287 − 115 (13, − 242) 228 ± 133 − 125 (− 3, − 247)*
Glycaemic range 6.49 ± 2.91 0.96 6.29 ± 2.68 − 0.20 (1.87, − 2.27) 6.53 ± 3.12 0.03 (1.94, − 1.87) 6.39 ± 2.39 − 0.10 (1.72, − 1.92)
MAGE 4.21 ± 2.04 0.12 3.76 ± 1.35 − 0.45 (0.56, − 1.46) 3.47 ± 1.59 − 0.74 (0.36, − 1.84) 3.42 ± 1.50 − 0.79 (0.52, − 2.09)
CONGA 7.25 ± 1.00 0.06 6.69 ± 0.72 − 0.57 (0.03, − 1.11) 6.93 ± 0.93 − 0.33 (0.18, − 0.83) 6.89 ± 0.53 − 0.36 (0.26, − 0.99)
Peak glucose breakfast 11.86 ± 2.84 0.24 11.19 ± 2.61 − 0.67 (0.76, − 2.10) 12.10 ± 3.06 0.24 (1.68, − 1.21) 12.02 ± 2.467 0.15 (1.25, − 0.94)
Peak glucose lunch 9.63 ± 1.33 0.28 9.12 ± 1.26 − 0.51 (0.12, − 1.13) 9.19 ± 1.30 − 0.44 (0.22, − 1.09) 8.97 ± 0.84 − 0.65 (0.62, − 1.93)
Peak glucose dinner 10.00 ± 1.12 0.06 9.43 ± 1.34 − 0.57 (0.35, − 1.50) 9.10 ± 1.25 − 0.90 (0.03, − 1.83) 9.89 ± 1.16 − 0.11 (0.52, − 0.74)
3- h PPG breakfast 9.08 ± 3.10 0.64 9.63 ± 3.10 0.55 (1.66, − 0.55) 9.41 ± 3.48 0.33 (2.04, − 1.37) 9.11 ± 2.96 0.03 (1.76, − 1.69)
3-h PPG lunch 8.41 ± 1.10 0.36 7.99 ± 1.24 − 0.42 (0.56, − 1.39) 7.99 ± 1.28 − 0.41 (0.40, − 1.23) 7.77 ± 0.76 − 0.64 (0.57, − 1.85)
3-h PPG dinner 8.78 ± 1.38 0.06 7.79 ± 1.17 − 0.99 (− 0.19, − 1.79) 7.65 ± 1.00 − 1.13 (− 0.01, − 2.25) 8.05 ± 0.77 − 0.73 (0.72, − 2.18)

Note that all data are in mmol/L unless stated otherwise

PPG postprandial glucose, AUC area under the curve,  exercise condition–control

*p < 0.05 vs CON

p = 0.08 vs CON