Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;9:1618. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01618

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Effects of abdominal binding (AB) vs. control (CTRL) on (A) the root mean square of the crural diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi,rms), (B) transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), (C) esophageal pressure (Pes), (D) tidal Pdi swing (Pdi,tidal) vs. EMGdi,rms, (E) gastric pressure (Pga) and (F) the quotient of Pdi,tidal to EMGdi,rms (an index of diaphragmatic neuromuscular efficiency) responses during constant-load cycle endurance exercise testing at 75% of peak incremental power output in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 20). Dashed lines in panels B,C,E denote peak tidal expiratory Pdi, Pes, and Pga, respectively. Data points are mean ± SEM values at rest, at standardized submaximal times during exercise (including isotime of 5.1 ± 1.0 min), and at peak exercise. p < 0.05 vs. CTRL.