Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;20(11):e270. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9366

Table 6.

Statistical tests and tools using Google Trends in health assessment.

Number Authors Method Description
1 Bragazzi et al, 2016 [43] Mann-Kendall test To show the statistical difference of peaks from the remaining period
2 Bragazzi et al, 2016 [63] ARIMAa To show increased web searches due to an event, and correct seasonality
3 Campen et al, 2014 [105] Independent samples t test; Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction For comparing searches with baseline period; for multiple weekly data comparisons
4 Crowson et al, 2016 [93] ANOVAb (Post-hoc Tukey test) To compare grouped geographical federal regions of the United States (Northeast, Midwest, South, West)
5 El-Sheikha, 2015 [113] Wilcoxon rank test; Mann-Whitney To study the change of interest at different time periods; to compare Web-based interest between the Northern and Southern hemispheres
6 Gahr et al, 2015 [75] Coefficients of determination To determine the amount of variability between annual prescription volumes and Google search terms
7 Harsha et al, 2014 [68] ANOVA (Tukey-Kramer post hot test) For the comparisons of US regions
8 Murray et al, 2016 [41] ANOVA; t test To explore differences in months’ means per year; for the statistical differences of peaks compared with the remaining hits
9 Noar et al, 2013 [64] Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests To test for nonstationarity of the time series
10 Phelan et al, 2014 [49] ANOVA To explore differences among countries
11 Rohart et al, 2016 [135] Mean Square Error for Prediction To assess prediction accuracy
12 Telfer and Woodburn, 2015 [140] Mann-Kendall trend tests To detect trends significantly larger than the variance in the data for search terms
13 Troelstra et al, 2016 [141] ARIMA Studied the effect of smoking cessation policies with ARIMA interrupted time series modeling (Multimedia Appendix 1)
14 Zhang et al, 2015 [71] Augmented Dickey-Fuller test To detect whether or not the extracted seasonal components of the studied trends were stationary
15 Zhang et al, 2016 [51] ANOVA To examine the search interest for dabbing between groups of legal status states in the United States

aARIMA: autoregressive integrated moving average.

bANOVA: analysis of variance.