Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;7(11):5803–5811. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1817

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis on the EQ‐5D utility score and the EQ‐VAS score of esophageal cancer patients

Variable EQ‐5D utility score
β (95% CI)
EQ‐VAS score
β (95% CI)
Clinical stage, reference group: severe dysplasia/CIS
Stage I −0.109** (−0.166, −0.051) −3.784** (−6.464, −1.104)
Stage II −0.114** (−0.172, −0.055) −5.025** (−7.741, −2.309)
Stage III −0.143** (−0.208, −0.080) −7.453** (−10.374, −4.533)
Stage IV −0.328** (−0.407, −0.249) −13.087** (−16.440, −9.734)
Other chronic diseases, reference group: no
Yes −0.033 (−0.079, 0.013) −2.918** (−5.013, −0.823)
Therapeutic regimen, reference group: surgery
Radical resection −0.043 (−0.106, 0.019) −3.013* (−5.885, −0.141)
Radiotherapy −0.123** (−0.197, −0.049) −7.653** (−10.990, −4.315)
Chemotherapy −0.066 (−0.138, 0.006) −3.433* (−6.856, −0.010)
Surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy −0.145** (−0.246, −0.044) −3.923 (−8.958, 1.112)
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy −0.111* (−0.197, −0.026) −5.484** (−9.266, −1.702)
Symptomatic treatment −0.133** (−0.208, −0.058) −6.042** (−9.719, −2.366)
Others 0.403* (0.232, 0.574) 8.693** (3.395, 13.990)
Marital status, reference group: married
Others −0.139** (−0.236, −0.042) −7.857** (−12.069, −3.645)

In addition to what have been reported in the table, a set of study center dummies have also been included. Other respondents’ characteristics which were included in the regression but statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) include age, gender, occupation, and duration of illness.

P < 0.05;

P < 0.01.