Table 1.
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery
| Author | Ref.1 | Published | Patient | Age2 | Gender | BMI2 | Procedures | Diagnosis | Size2 | Conversion rate to | Positive | Complications | Mortality | Recurrence | Folow-up |
| year | number | (male/female) | (kg/m2) | (mm) | gastrectomy or laparotomy | surgical margin | (treatment and case number) | rate | period2 | ||||||
| (case) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (mo) | |||||||||||
| Hiki et al | [50] | 2008 | 7 | 53 ± 6 | 0/7 | 22.0 ± 1 | Classic LECS | SMT | 46 | 0 | 0 | None | 0 | - | - |
| Kikuchi et al | [51] | 2017 | 10 | 62 | 5/5 | - | Closed LECS | SMT | 24.1 | 0 | - | Intra-abdominal abscess (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Mitsui et al | [56] | 2014 | 6 | 60 | 4/2 | - | NEWS | SMT | 34 | 0 | 0 | None | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Inoue et al | [58] | 2012 | 24 | 66.2 | - | - | Clean-NET | EGC | - | - | - | Gastric deformity | 0 | 0 | - |
| (Reoperation, n=1) | |||||||||||||||
| Okumura et al | [59] | 2017 | 28 | 67.6 | 8/20 | - | Lift-and-cut method | GIST | 33 | 0 | 0 | None | 0 | 0 | 26.6 |
| Matsuda et al | [71] | 2016 | 100 | 59.8 | 47/53 | 22.7 ± 3.3 | Classic LECS | SMT | 30.9 | 5 | 0 | Leakage (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 25.3 |
| Postoperative stenossis (n = 2) | |||||||||||||||
| Postoperative bleeding (n = 1) | |||||||||||||||
| Tsujimoto et al | [72] | 2012 | 20 | 59.3 ± 11.9 | 10/10 | 21.8 ± 2.7 | NEWS | SMT | 37.9 ± 11 | 0 | 0 | None | 0 | 0 | 20.7 |
| Kawahira et al | [73] | 2012 | 16 | 61 | 4/12 | 22.1 | Classic LECS | SMT | 27.5 | 0 | 0 | Lymphorrhea (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hoteya et al | [74] | 2014 | 25 | 60 | 10/15 | - | LECS | SMT in EGJ | 32.3 | 0 | 0 | None | 0 | 0 | 18 |
1
See the reference list;
2
Data were given as mean ± SD, or the median. BMI: Body mass index; Clean-NET: Clean non-exposure technique; EGC: Early gastric cancer; EGJ: Esophagogastric junction; GIST: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; LECS: Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery; NEWS: Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery; SMT: Submucosal tumor.