Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;18:1145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4997-y

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the training (n = 71) and validation cohorts (n = 75)

Clinicopathologic indexes Training cohort (n = 71) Validation cohort (n = 75) P
Age (mean, y ± SD) 54 ± 12 54 ± 12 0.801
Gender 0.011
 Male 47 (66%) 34 (45%)
 Female 24 (34%) 41 (55%)
Tumor differentiation 0.005
 Well/Moderately 34 (48%) 56 (75%)
 Poorly/Undifferentiated 37 (52%) 19 (25%)
Distance from anal verge 0.259
 ≦5 cm 35 (49%) 30 (40%)
  > 5 cm 36 (51%) 45 (60%)
Tumor length (median; range) 4 (2–12) 4 (2–11) 0.948
Circumferential extent 0.113
 ≦50% 17 (24%) 27 (36%)
  > 50% 54 (76%) 48 (64%)
Pretreatment T stage < 0.001
 T2 0 6 (8%)
 T3 52 (73%) 62 (83%)
 T4 19 (27%) 7 (9%)
Pretreatment N stage 0.119
 N0 12 (17%) 21 (28%)
 N1 30 (42%) 34 (45%)
 N2 29 (41%) 20 (27%)
Pre- treatment CEA level (mean, ng/mL; rang) 27 (5–200) 14 (5–57) 0.001
Post- treatment CEA level (mean, ng/mL; rang) 5 (0.5–45) 6 (0.5–34) 0.605
Normalization of post- treatment CEA Level 0.541
 Normal (< 5 ng/mL) 47 (66%) 46 (61%)
 Elevated (≧5 ng/mL) 24 (34%) 29 (39%)
CEA clearance pattern 0.599
 Exponential decrease (R2≧0.9) 31 (44%) 36 (48%)
 Non-exponential decrease (R2 < 0.9) 40 (56%) 39 (52%)

The p value in boldface means statistically significant, that is, less than 0.05