Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;18:1145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4997-y

Table 7.

Multivariate regression analysis with TRG as dependent variable

Variable TRG 0–1 TRG 2–3 P Odds Ratio (95%CI)
Training cohort
 Tumor length 0.037 3.19 (1.07–9.46)
  ≦4 cm 19 (42%) 11 (71%)
   > 4 cm 14 (58%) 27 (29%)
 Circumferential extent 0.146 2.65 (0.71–9.86)
  ≦50% 12 (36%) 5 (13%)
   > 50% 21 (64%) 33 (87%)
 Normalization of post- treatment CEA Level 0.082 2.81 (0.88–9.01)
  Normal (< 5 ng/mL) 26 (79%) 21 (55%)
 Elevated (≧5 ng/mL) 7 (21%) 17 (45%)
 CEA clearance pattern 0.161 2.18 (0.73–6.44)
  Exponential decrease (R2≧0.9) 19 (58%) 12 (32%)
  Non-exponential decrease (R2 < 0.9) 14 (42%) 26 (68%)
Validation cohort
 Tumor length 0.009 4.23 (1.43–12.50)
  ≦4 cm 19 (58%) 12 (29%)
   > 4 cm 14 (42%) 30 (64%)
 Circumferential extent 0.147 0.42 (0.13–1.35)
  ≦50% 9 (27%) 18 (43%)
   > 50% 24 (73%) 24 (57%)
 Normalization of post- treatment CEA Level 0.884 0.92 (0.29–2.92)
  Normal (< 5 ng/mL) 23 (70%) 23 (55%)
  Elevated (≧5 ng/mL) 10 (30%) 19 (45%)
 CEA clearance pattern 0.009 4.37 (1.44–13.23)
  Exponential decrease (R2≧0.9) 21 (64%) 15 (36%)
  Non-exponential decrease (R2 < 0.9) 12 (36%) 27 (64%)

Abbreviation: TRG tumor regression grade

The p value in boldface means statistically significant, that is, less than 0.05