Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;40(6):667–677. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fby043

Table I:

Extracellular superoxide (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production by the organisms examined in this study

Species Strain Dilution level cells mL−1 ROS Production
fmol cell−1 h−1
O2 H2O2
Chattonella marina ARC260 1:1 14 000 49 ± 1 (n = 4) 87 ± 3 (n = 4)
1:10 1400 40 ± 11 (n = 4) 162 ± 35 (n = 3)
1:100 140 68 ± 24 (n = 2) 2658 ± 408 (n = 4)
Filtrate 0 5 ± 1 (n = 4) 12 ± 1 (n = 4)
Heterosigma akashiwo ARC114 1:1 150 000 0.9 ± 0.3 (n = 4) BD
1:10 15 000 10 ± 2 (n = 4) BD
1:100 1500 95 ± 15 (n = 3) BD
Filtrate 0 1.5 ± 0.2 (n = 4) 1.2 ± 0.1 (n = 4)
Karenia brevis ARC5 1:1 5300 12 ± 2 (n = 4) 5 ± 1 (n = 4)
1:10 530 50 ± 18 (n = 4) 19 ± 6 (n = 3)
1:100 53 BD 397 ± 45 (n = 3)
Filtrate 0 BD BD
Pseudo-nitzschia sp. ARC447 1:1 10 000 10 ± 9 (n = 2) 0.9 ± 0.2 (n = 4)
1:10 1000 118 ± 35 (n = 4) 4 ± 1 (n = 3)
1:100 100 431 ± 248 (n = 3) 56 ± 21 (n = 4)
Filtrate 0 24 ± 2 (n = 4) BD
Aureococcus anophagefferens CCMP1984 1:1 210 000 0.1 ± 0.1 (n = 4) BD
1:10 21 000 0.6 ± 0.2 (n = 4) 0.7 ± 0.1 (n = 4)
1:100 2100 10 ± 3 (n = 3) 8 ± 1 (n = 4)
Filtrate 0 0.1 ± 0.0 (n = 4) 0.1 ± 0.0 (n = 4)

The ROS production rates in cell-free filtrates were normalized to the original cell density in the undiluted (1:1) culture at the time of sampling. Mean ROS production rates ± standard error of the mean are provided. BD, below detection.