Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 25;96(11):4483–4489. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky337

Table 2.

Comparison of rumination times of 10 dairy calves recorded by the RumiWatch system (RWS; ITIN + HOCH GmbH Feeding Technology, Liestal, Switzerland) and visual observations on a video

Approach
MF01 MF102 MF53
A) Rumination time, h/12 h
 RWS 3.69 ± 0.20 2.03 ± 0.20 2.43 ± 0.20
 Video 2.46 ± 0.23 2.46 ± 0.23 2.46 ± 0.23
P value4 <0.01 0.001 0.60
B) Linear regression model
 Slope 0.87 0.88 0.93
 95% CI range for slope 0.79–0.94 0.82–0.95 0.88–0.98
 Intercept (SEM) 7.70 ± 0.64 -0.75 ± 0.57 0.73 ± 0.40
 R2 0.82 0.86 0.93
 P value5 <0.01 0.19 0.07

Data were processed as rumination time (min/h) in 12 one-h periods per each calf yielding a total of 120 pairs of values.

1Model includes raw data of the RWS (no filtering).

2Model excludes rumination events lasting less than 10 min as recoded by the RWS.

3Model excludes rumination events lasting less than five min as recoded by the RWS.

4Comparison of rumination times determined by RWS vs. video using paired t-test.

5Deviation of the intercept from zero.