Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;96(11):4835–4844. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky298

Table 6.

Nutritional composition of feedstuffs compared with other researches (DM basis)

Feedstuff CP NDF ADF Researcher
MC
2.50% 45.80% Kaliyan et al. (2010)
2.60% 78.80% 43.70% Spanghero et al. (2010)
3.04% 79.25% 45.80% This study
DG
28.00% 40.00% 18.00% Preston et al. (2011)
28.90% 35. 80% 18.60% Spanghero et al. (2010)
14.20% 42.61% 34.65% This study
SMS
7.2–11.1% 64–78.2% 42. 8–66.3% Bae et al. (2006)
5.90% 76.10% 59.10% Kwak et al. (2008)
7.48% 57.82% 45.51% This study
CPP
7.00% 21.00% 20.00% Preston et al. (2011)
6.54% 25.90% 16.10% Pereira et al. (2004)
4.49% 31.78% 27.23% This study
RS
4.00% 72.00% 47.00% Preston et al. (2011)
5.60% 76.90% 44.60% Eun et al. (2006)
2.73% 75.58% 45.71% This study