Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;96(11):4768–4779. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky338

Table 3.

Effects of supplementation with lysozyme during the late gestation and lactation on the performance of sows and piglets1

Treatment
Item Control LZM 150 LZM 300 SEM P-value
Sows2
Backfat thickness, mm
 Day 85 of gestation 14.56 14.35 14.45 0.29 0.96
 Day 100 of gestation 15.72 15.40 15.70 0.31 0.89
 Day 1 of lactation 16.06 16.25 16.50 0.32 0.86
 Weaning 13.22 13.25 13.80 0.31 0.69
 Gestation increase kg 1.50 1.90 2.05 0.14 0.29
 Lactation loss kg 2.83 3.00 2.70 0.26 0.89
 ADFI3, kg/d 5.26b 5.70a 5.80a 0.06 <0.01
 WEI, d 5.14a 4.58b 4.56b 0.10 0.04
 BR, % 90.00 95.00 95.00 0.03 0.76
 CR, % 76.80 90.00 85.00 0.04 0.34
Litter size
 Total born 11.71 11.88 11.94 0.31 0.95
 Alive at birth 10.31 10.21 11.00 0.33 0.56
 Weakling 0.39 0.15 0.40 0.09 0.46
 Stillborn 0.89a 1.10a 0.15b 0.16 0.03
Piglets4
 Neonatal weight, kg 1.54 1.57 1.64 0.03 0.39
 Weaning weight, kg 6.21 6.39 6.40 0.07 0.34
 Diarrhea rate 5 (%) 2.24a 1.67b 1.41b 0.01 0.03

1LZM 150 = control diet + lysozyme 150 g/t, LZM 300 = control diet + lysozyme 300 g/t. ADFI = average daily feed intake, WEI = weaning-to-estrus interval, BR = rebreeding rate, CR = conception rate.

2Data are means of 20 sows.

3Average daily feed intake during the lactation.

4Data are means of 20 litters from 20 sows.

5Diarrhea rate = total diarrhea piglets × diarrhea days / [litter size at birth (live) × trial days].

a,bWithin a row, means with different superscripts are different (P < 0.05).