Table 2.
16 Criteria | Number of patients (%) |
Odds ratio (95% CI) |
P- value |
---|---|---|---|
Distended abdomen | |||
Yes | 36 (31.03) | 134.07 (27.46–654.53) |
<.001 |
No | 80 (68.97) | 1 (Reference) | |
Diarrhea with explosive stool | |||
Yes | 28 (24.14) | 121.50 (15.36–961.06) |
<.001 |
No | 88 (75.86) | 1 (Reference) | |
Diarrhea with foul smelling stool | |||
Yes | 27 (23.28) | 110.12 (13.95–869.21) |
<.001 |
No | 89 (76.72) | 1 (Reference) | |
Lethargy* | |||
Yes | 23 (19.83) | 168.51 (21.71–21,732.18) |
<.001 |
No | 93 (80.17) | 1 (Reference) | |
Explosive discharge of gas and stool on rectal exam | |||
Yes | 22 (18.97) | 68.73 (8.74–540.38) |
<.001 |
No | 94 (81.03) | 1 (Reference) | |
Fever | |||
Yes | 22 (18.97) | 68.73 (8.74–540.38) |
<.001 |
No | 94 (81.03) | 1 (Reference) | |
Dilated loops of bowel on AXR | |||
Yes | 18 (15.52) | 21.04 (4.53–97.67) |
<.001 |
No | 98 (84.48) | 1 (Reference) | |
Leukocytosis* | |||
Yes | 15 (12.93) | 79.95 (10.16–10,330.11) |
<.001 |
No | 101 (87.07) | 1 (Reference) | |
Decreased peripheral perfusion* | |||
Yes | 13 (11.21) | 65.07 (8.18–8421.86) |
<.001 |
No | 103 (88.79) | 1 (Reference) | |
Multiple air fluid levels | |||
Yes | 10 (8.62) | 19.06 (2.32–156.55) |
0.006 |
No | 106(91.38) | 1 (Reference) | |
Previous history of suspected enterocolitis* | |||
Yes | 9 (7.76) | 40.48 (4.89–5273.84) |
<.001 |
No | 107 (92.24) | 1 (Reference; | |
Left shift on complete blood count* | |||
Yes | 9 (7.76) | 40.48 (4.89–5273.84) |
<.001 |
No | 107 (92.24) | 1 (Reference) | |
Diarrhea with bloody stool* | |||
Yes | 3 (2.59) | 12.70 (1.19–1724.37) |
0.034 |
No | 113 (97.41) | 1 (Reference) | |
Cutoff sign in rectosigmoid region* | |||
Yes | 2 (1.72) | 8.85 (0.70–1232.85) |
0.096 |
No | 114(98.28) | 1 (Reference) | |
Sawtooth appearance with irregular mucosal lining* | |||
Yes | 1 (0.86) | 5.19 (0.27–764.08) |
0.274 |
No | 115 (99.14) | 1 (Reference) | |
Pneumatosis intestinalis* | |||
Yes | 1 (0.86) | 5.19 (0.27–764.08) |
0.274 |
No | 115 (99.14) | 1 (Reference) |
Firth’s penalized maximum likelihood estimation along with profile-likelihood con-fidence interval and p-value from penalized likelihood ratio test [10,11] was reported to reduce bias in the parameter estimates since quasi-complete separation of data points was detected and the maximum likelihood estimate may not exist.