Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jul 14;53(4):708–717. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.009

Table 5.

Risk score derived from the model with 4 criteria predicting the presence versus absence of HAEC episodes and estimates of sensitivity and specificity at different threshold values for the risk score.

Risk score* Number of patients (%) Crude HAEC episode incidence rate (%)
19 0 Not applicable
15 8 (6.9) 100
14 6 (5.17) 100
10 7 (6.03) 100
9 7 (6.03) 100
5 7 (6.03) 85.71
4 5 (4.31) 60
0 76 (65.52) 7.89
Cut-off value
(≥ versus <)
Sensitivity
(exact 95% CI) (%)
Specificity
(exact 95% CI) (%)
Area under the ROC
curve (AUC) (95% CI)
4 86.05 (72.07–94.70) 95.89 (88.46–99.14) 0.910 (0.853–0.967)
5 79.07 (63.96–89.96) 98.63 (92.60–99.97) 0.889 (0.826–0.952)
9 55.12 (49.97–78.99) 100.00(95.07–100) 0.826 (0.754–0.898)
10 48.84 (33.31–64.54) 100.00 (95.07–100) 0.744 (0.669–0.820)
14 32.56 (19.08–48.54) 100.00 (95.07–100) 0.663 (0.592–0.734)
15 18.61 (8.39–33.40) 100.00 (95.07–100) 0.593 (0.534–0.652)
*

Risk score = 5 × diarrhea with explosive stool (1 if presence; 0 if absence) + 5 × -decreased peripheral perfusion (1 if presence; 0 if absence) + 5 × lethargy (1 if presence; 0 if absence) + 4 × dilated loops of bowel on AXR (1 if presence; 0 if absence).