Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0206039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206039

Table 3. Broad perceptions of group and individual components of schema therapy.

Topics/Themes N (%)
A. Benefits gained and challenges faced in ST
A1. Extent to which ST provided insight 31 (86)
A2. Ability to act differently and cope adaptively 26 (72)
A3. Changes in connection with one’s emotions 18 (50)
A4. Change in confidence levels and assertiveness 17 (47)
A5. Extent to which ST minimized harshness to the self 15 (42)
A6. Necessity of difficulty level in ST 14 (39)
B. Perceptions of ST as compared to previous therapies
B1. Degree of focus on internal processes 16 (44)
B2. Extent to which ST was prescriptive vs. tailored to individual needs 11 (31)
C. Group experiences and dynamics
C1. Sense of connection among group members 33 (92)
C2. Extent to which one felt safe, accepted and able to trust others 28 (78)
C3. Feelings that arose when comparing oneself against others 18 (50)
C4. Gender composition of the group 18 (50)
D. Structure and format of therapy
D1. Extent to which group and individual ST complemented each other 27 (75)
D2. The use of experiential techniques 25 (69)
D3. Duration/length of therapy sessions 22 (61)
D4. The use of schema-mode model 21 (58)
D5. Email access to therapists outside working hours 13 (36)
E. Therapeutic relationships
E1. Extent to which patients feel supported by their therapists 29 (81)