Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1443–1452. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002950

Table 3.

Proportion of map results that facilitated, did not facilitate, and hindered abortion self-referral

Characteristic Facilitated
abortion self-
referral
Did not facilitate
abortion self-referral
Hindered
abortion self-
referral
P
All map results (n=1,543) 1,039 (67.3) 169 (11.0) 335 (21.7)
Search engine <0.001
 A (n=482) 322 (66.8) 45 (9.3) 115 (23.9)
 B (n=640) 376 (58.8) 100 (15.6) 164 (25.6)
 C (n=421) 341 (81.0) 24 (5.7) 56 (13.3)
Search strategy 0.09
 ”Abortion” and city (n=663) 429 (64.7) 82 (12.4) 152 (22.9)
 ”Abortion clinic” and city
 (n=635)
430 (67.7) 62 (9.8) 143 (22.5)
 ”Where to get an abortion”
 and city (n=245)
180 (73.5) 25 (10.2) 40 (16.3)
Subregion <0.001
 New England (n=121) 85 (70.3) 12 (9.9) 24 (19.8)
 Middle Atlantic (n=117) 87 (74.4) 12 (10.3) 18 (15.4)
 South Atlantic (n=287) 211 (73.5) 10 (3.5) 66 (23.0)
 East South Central (n=92) 54 (58.7) 10 (10.9) 28 (30.4)
 West South Central (n=232) 161 (69.4) 42 (18.1) 29 (12.5)
 East North Central (n=176) 125 (71.0) 15 (8.5) 36 (20.5)
 West North Central (n=102) 35 (34.3) 12 (11.8) 55 (53.9)
 Mountain (n=180) 105 (58.3) 33 (18.3) 42 (23.3)
 Pacific (n=236) 176 (74.6) 23 (9.8) 37 (15.7)
Distance to abortion provider <0.001
 <50 miles (n=1,304) 936 (71.8) 137 (10.5) 231 (17.7)
 50 -<100 miles (n=188) 88 (46.8) 27 (14.4) 73 (38.8)
 ≥100 miles (n=51) 15 (29.4) 5 (9.8) 31 (60.8)