Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1412–1420. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002964

Table 3.

Kappa agreement of infection detection between sample types

Result (Sample 1/Sample 2)
Sample 1 Sample 2 Positive/ Positive Positive/ Negative Negative/ Positive Negative/ Negative Kappa (95%CI)
hrHPV*
N=193
Self-home Self-clinic 19 5 11 158 0.66 (0.49–0.80)
Self-home Clinician§ 16 8 6 163 0.66 (0.46–0.80)
Self-clinic Clinician 16 14 6 157 0.56 (0.36–0.73)
TV ||
N=186
Self-home Self-clinic 17 2 3 164 0.86 (0.71–0.96)
Self-home Clinician 17 2 2 165 0.88 (0.74–0.98)
Self-clinic Clinician 18 2 1 165 0.91 (0.80–1.00)
MG
N=181
Self-home Self-clinic 8 1 2 170 0.83 (0.59–1.00)
Self-home Clinician 5 4 1 171 0.65 (0.27–0.92)
Self-clinic Clinician 6 4 0 171 0.74 (0.44–0.94)
*

hrHPV=high-risk human papillomavirus;

Self-home=cervico-vaginal sample self-collected at home;

Self-clinic=cervico-vaginal sample self-collected in clinic,

§

Clinician=cervical sample collected by clinician;

||

TV= Trichomonas vaginalis;

MG= Mycoplasma genitalium; 95%CI=95% confidence interval.

Analyses for each infection among women with available results for all three sample types.