Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Oct 18;75:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.10.011

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of child and parent participants, by condition

Total Sample
(n=132)
Intervention
(n=66)
Control
(n=66)
Child Characteristics
Age (M, SD) 9 (0.9) 9 (0.9) 9 (0.9)
Gender (% Male) 67 (51%) 32 (48%) 35(52%)
Race/Ethnicity
 White 49 (37%) 24 (36%) 25 (38%)
 Hispanic 30 (23%) 15 (23%) 15 (23%)
 Black 28 (21%) 13 (20%) 15 (23%)
 Other 25 (19%) 14 (21%) 11 (17%)
BMI z Score (M, SD) 1.6 (0.67) 1.5 (0.65) 1.7 (0.68)
Weight Status
 BMI% < 85th 29 (22%) 19 (29%) 10 (15%)
 85th% ≤ BMI% <95th 36 (27%) 19 (29%) 17 (26%)
 ≥95th 67 (51%) 28 (42%) 39 (59%)
% Body Fat (M, SE)1
 Girls 32.6 (1.12) 31.7 (1.55) 34.0 (1.60)
 Boys 28.6 (1.27) 26.3 (1.51) 30.4 (1.94)
Pubertal development (M, SD)2
 Girls 1.8 (0.58) 1.7 (0.59) 1.9 (0.56)
 Boys 1.6 (0.42) 1.5 (0.32) 1.6 (0.47)
Parent Characteristics
Age (M, SD) 39 (7.1) 39 (7.4) 39 (6.7)
Gender (% Female) 124 (94%) 63 (96%) 61 (92%)
Race/Ethnicity
 White 76 (58%) 40 (61%) 36 (55%)
 Black 26 (20%) 12 (18%) 14 (21%)
 Hispanic 17 (13%) 9 (14%) 8 (12%)
 Other 13 (10%) 5 (8%) 8 (12%)
Weight Status
 BMI < 25 34 (26%) 19 (29%) 15 (23%)
 25 ≤ BMI < 30 35 (27%) 17 (26%) 18 (27%)
 BMI ≥ 30 63 (48%) 30 (46%) 33 (50%)
% Body Fat (M, SE)3
 Female 37.9 (0.85) 37.4 (1.06) 38.4 (1.34)
Education
 ≤ high school 23 (17%) 10 (15%) 13 (20%)
 Some college 35 (27%) 18 (27%) 17 (26%)
 Associate degree 21 (16%) 12 (18%) 9 (14%)
 ≥ Bachelor’s degree 53 (40%) 26 (39%) 27 (41%)
Economic assistance (% Yes) 78 (59%) 41 (62%) 37 (56%)
1

Total Sample=131; Intervention=Girls (n=33) and Boys (n=32); Control=Girls (n=31) and boys (n=35)

2

Based on child self-reported scale with range of 1–4.

3

Total Sample=122 females (n=62 intervention, n=60 control). Males (n=8) were excluded due to small numbers when categorized by condition.