Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Cell Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(12):1030–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.09.002

Table 1. Algorithms used to quantify cell identities.

Algorithm Data input Molecular identifiers Basis for selection of molecular identifiersa Quantification Single-cell source Dimension reduction Example application
CellNet, 2014 [20] RNA-seq data Key gene regulatory networks from database Specificity, regulatory influence Similarity in the gene regulatory network expression distribution Mouse, human N/A Identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation; quantification of cell identity score
Mogrify, 2016 [25] Cell types Differentially expressed genes; core transcription factors from database Abundance, specificity, regulatory influence Scores of key transcription factors Mouse, human N/A (MDS used in later steps for landscape construction) Identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation; prediction of transdifferentiation potential of a cell type
sci-MET, 2018 [17] Single-cell bisulfite sequencing data Top 1000 variable methylation regulatory loci from database Variance Correlation in DNA methylation pattern between sample data and database Human NMF followed by t-SNE Prediction of cell identity

Abbreviations: multidimensional scaling (MDS), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE)

a

Although abundance is not always explicitly mentioned as a selection criterion, it is an implicit criterion for all algorithms due to sensitivity limits in experimental measurements.