Table 1. Algorithms used to quantify cell identities.
Algorithm | Data input | Molecular identifiers | Basis for selection of molecular identifiersa | Quantification | Single-cell source | Dimension reduction | Example application |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CellNet, 2014 [20] | RNA-seq data | Key gene regulatory networks from database | Specificity, regulatory influence | Similarity in the gene regulatory network expression distribution | Mouse, human | N/A | Identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation; quantification of cell identity score |
Mogrify, 2016 [25] | Cell types | Differentially expressed genes; core transcription factors from database | Abundance, specificity, regulatory influence | Scores of key transcription factors | Mouse, human | N/A (MDS used in later steps for landscape construction) | Identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation; prediction of transdifferentiation potential of a cell type |
sci-MET, 2018 [17] | Single-cell bisulfite sequencing data | Top 1000 variable methylation regulatory loci from database | Variance | Correlation in DNA methylation pattern between sample data and database | Human | NMF followed by t-SNE | Prediction of cell identity |
Abbreviations: multidimensional scaling (MDS), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE)
Although abundance is not always explicitly mentioned as a selection criterion, it is an implicit criterion for all algorithms due to sensitivity limits in experimental measurements.