Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 9;6:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2018.11.001

Table 2.

Practices of antimicrobial usage on livestock by pastoralist in North-central Nigeria.

Practice Frequency
Proportion
95% CI
(n) (%)
Personnel that prescribe antimicrobials for usage in animals
Animal health officials 117 30.5 26.0, 35.2
Self prescription 224 58.3 53.4, 63.2
Friends and relations 43 11.2 8.3, 14.7



Purchasing places of antimicrobials
Veterinary drug shops 229 59.6 54.7, 64.5
Human drug shops 21 5.5 3.5, 8.1
Animal drug hawkers 134 34.9 30.3, 39.8



Who administer antimicrobials on animals
Self administered 251 65.4 60.5, 70.0
Animal health officials 133 34.6 30.0, 39.5



Frequency of antimicrobial usage on sick animals
As prescribed 103 26.8 22.6, 31.4
Once 109 28.4 24.0, 33.1
Once daily until recovered 172 45.6 40.6, 50.6



Dosage determination before antimicrobials use
From instructions on the label 125 32.6 28.0, 37.4
Arbitrary 259 67.4 62.4, 72.0



Frequently used route of administration
Injection 215 56.0 51.0, 60.9
Mouth (POS) 96 25.0 20.9, 29.5
On the skin (topical) 42 10.9 8.1, 14.4
In feed 31



Observe about withdrawal periods
Yes 61 15.9 12.5, 19.8
No 323 84.1 80.2, 87.5



Purpose for antimicrobials usage
Treatment of infections 209 54.4 49.4, 59.4
Prevention of infections 156 40.6 35.8, 45.6
Growth promotion 19 4.9 3.1, 7.5

CI – Confidence interval.