Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;18:452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x

Table 5.

Summary of studies – guidelines or information for providers

Study;
Design;
Country, setting;
Funding
Population;
Study period
Intervention & comparator (no. of participants) TOLAC ratea VBAC ratea VBAC/TOLAC ratea
Bellows (2016)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, tertiary care academic hospital
Funding NR
All women who underwent TOLAC, at least one prior CD & live, singleton gestation in cephalic presentation, 24 0/7 weeks of gestation
July 1, 2009-December 31, 2013
Grp 1 (2009–2011): pre-2011 guideline (n = 450) Grp 2 (2011–2013): post-2011 guideline implementation (offering TOLAC; inducing labor; administering oxytocin) (n = 781) NR Grp 1: NR (26.0%)
Grp 2: NR (33.3%)
Grp 1: 351 (78.1%)
Grp 2: 616 (78.9%), p = 0.75
Kosecoff (1987)
Retrospective cohort
US, acute, non-specialty, nonfederal hospitals > 150 beds.
Non-industry funded
Women with previous low transverse CS
January 1979–December 1979 (time 1)
January 1980–September 1980 (time 2)
July 1981–June 1982 (time 3)
Period 1 (January–December 1979) & Period 2 (January–September 1980): before NIH Consensus Development conference recommendations (n = 35 & n = 64) Period 3 (1981–1982): after conference recommendations; women should be given TOLAC for potential VD (n = 70) Period 1: 2 (5.7%)
Period 2: 7 (10.9%)
vs.
Period 3: 20 (28.6%)
Period 1: 2 (5.7%)
Period 2: 4 (6.3%)
vs.
Period 3: 11 (15.7%)
Period 1: 2 (100%)
Period 2: 4 (57.1%)
vs.
Period 3: 11 (55.0%)
Pinette (2004)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, birth certificate & hospital reported data
Funding NR
All women with previous CS giving birth at 20 weeks of gestation or more
1998–2001
Grp 1 (1998): pre-exposure (birth certificate n = 1410; hospital data n = 1386) Grp 2 (1999–2001): ACOG guideline revision (birth certificate data n = 4463; hospital data n = 4015) NR Birth certificate data:
1998: 424 (30.1%)
vs.
1999: 327 (22.6%)
2000: 277 (17.9%)
2001: 193 (13.1%)
1988 vs. 2001,
RR 2.8 (95% CI 2.5–3.2), p < 0.01
Hospital-reported data:
1998: 489 (35.3%)
vs.
1999: 411 (28.2%)
2000: 321 (23.1%)
2001: 156 (13.3%)
RR 3.5 (95% CI 3.1–4.2), p < 0.01
NR
Sanchez –Ramos (1990)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, regional perinatal center
Funding NR
Women with one or two previous CS, with low transverse or vertical scars not extending into uterine corpus
1986–1989
Grp 1 (1986–1987): before July 1, 1987 department-wide guideline change (n = 899) Grp 2 (1988–1989): after July 1, 1987, new guidelines for intrapartum management (n = 1105) 1986: 139 (31.7%)
1987: 193 (41.9%)
vs.
1988: 402 (76.6%)
1989: 487 (84.0%);
Difference: 52.2%, p < 0.0001
1986: 90 (20.5%)
1987: 142 (30.8%)
vs.
1988: 342 (65.1%)
1989: 403 (69.5%);
Difference: 48.9%; p < 0.0001
1986: 90 (64.7%)
1987: 142 (73.6%)
vs.
1988: 342 (85.1%)
1989: 403 (82.8%);
Difference: 18.0%; p < 0.0001
Santerre (1996)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, hospitals
Funding NR
Women with a previous CS
1987–1991
Grp 1 (before 1987–1988): before practice guideline implementation (n = NR) Grp 2 (after Oct. 1988): ACOG practice guideline, prior cesarean section no longer a reason for repeat cesarean (n = NR) NR VBAC rate in US (data for Massachusetts hospitals NR)
1985: 6.6%
1986: 8.5%
1987: 9.8%
1988: 12.6%
vs.
1989: 18.5%
1990: 20.4%
1991: 24.2%
1992: 25.1%
1993: 25.4%
NR
Studnicki (1997)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, nonfederal acute care provider hospitals
Funding NR
Women with prior CS
1990–1993
Grp 1 (1990–1992): before practice guidelines
(n = 66,702)
Grp 2 (1993): after legislatively imposed practice guidelines (n = 23,142) NR 1990: 4816 (21.8%)
1991: 5540 (25.6%)
1992: 6133 (26.7%)
vs.
1993: 7151 (30.9%)
NR
Zweifler (2006)
Non-concurrent cohort
US, California Department of Health Services Birth Statistical Master Files
Funding NR
Women who previously gave birth by cesarean delivery & had singleton birth planned in a California hospital
1996–2002
Grp 1 (1996–1999): before ACOG VBAC guideline revision (n = NRb) Grp 2 (2000–2002): after ACOG VBAC guideline revision (n = NRb) Attempted VBAC:
Grp 1: NR (24.0%)
Grp 2: NR (13.5%)
Difference: 44% decrease, p < 0.001
1996–2002: 61,684 (16.0%) NR

no. number, TOLAC trial of labor after cesarean, VBAC vaginal birth after cesarean, US United States, NR not reported, CD cesarean delivery, Grp group, CS cesarean section, NIH National Institute of Health, VD vaginal delivery, vs. versus, ACOG American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, RR relative risk, CI confidence interval

aResults of statistical tests or summary statistics were extracted whenever these were reported within studies

bStudy reported number of live births separately from number of women; table reflects data for number of women whenever this was reported