Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;18:1148. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5024-z

Table 4.

C-indices of rad-score based nomograms, clinicopathological nomograms and traditional staging systems

Training cohort Validation cohort
TTR OS TTR OS
C-index 95%CI C-index 95%CI C-index 95%CI C-index 95%CI
Rad-score 0.563 0.516–0.610 0.541 0.488–0.594 0.555 0.491–0.619 0.629 0.529–0.729
Rad-score based nomograms 0.639 0.577–0.701 0.714 0.635–0.793 0.587 0.479–0.695 0.710 0.602–0.818
Clinical-pathological nomograms 0.633 0.571–0.695 0.554 0.485–0.623 0.601 0.592–0.610 0.642 0.532–0.752
Rad-score-TNM nomogram 0.584 0.531–0.637 0.626 0.549–0.703 0.601 0.530–0.672 0.617 0.507–0.727
Rad-score-BCLC nomogram 0.580 0.526–0.634 0.627 0.549–0.705 0.601 0.523–0.679 0.622 0.509–0.735
Traditional staging system
TNM 0.552 0.513–0.581 0.575 0.515–0.635 0.553 0.499–0.607 0.521 0.453–0.589
BCLC 0.547 0.506–0.588 0.574 0.511–0.637 0.548 0.485–0.611 0.506 0.420–0.592
JIS 0.554 0.508–0.600 0.601 0.533–0.669 0.564 0.503–0.625 0.574 0.504–0.644
HKLC 0.575 0.529–0.631 0.628 0.620–0.636 0.582 0.507–0.657 0.596 0.487–0.701

Abbreviation: TNM Tumor–node–metastasis, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage system, JIS Japan Integrated Staging, HKLC Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging score