Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 22;13:121. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0806-6

Table 3.

Flow insufficiency according to MLD higher and lower than cut-off value and stenosis location

Bypass graft Stenosis location Reference diameter (mm) MLD < cutt-off value Cut-off value (mm) calculated % stenosis MLD > cut-off value
in-situ ITA Proximal 3.07 ± 0.75 8/159 1.29 58% 7/42
(5.0%) *p = 0.01 (16.7%)
Distal 2.42 ± 0.53 10/100 0.95 61% 10/33
(10.0%) *p = 0.005 (30.3%)
in-situ ITA Proximal 3.21 ± 0.84 1/46 1.26 61% 7/21
(2.2%) *p = 0.0003 (33.3%)
Distal 2.40 ± 0.53 7/35 0.80 67% 16/27
(20.0%) *p = 0.0005 (59.3%)
in-situ GEA Proximal 3.00 ± 0.73 22/110 1.27 58% 5/10
(20.0%) *p = 0.03 (50.0%)
Distal 2.79 ± 0.77 N/A

GEA; gastroepiploic artery ITA; internal thoracic artery LAD; left anterior descending artery LCX; left circumflex artery

MLD; minimalluminal diameter RCA; right coronary artery *; comparison of higher versus lower than MLD