Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct;59:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.005

Table 4.

Analogue intrusive memories, hyperarousal and avoidance symptoms as a function of experimental trauma induction paradigm.

Stress induction paradigm
Virtual Reality (VR) Script-Driven Imagery (SDI) Test statistic p ES ηp2/d
M (SD) M (SD)
IMQ
 Frequency of intrusive images 2.28 (2.36) 1.35 (1.34) F(1/125) = 7.23 0.008 0.06
 Frequency of intrusive thoughts 2.63 (2.97) 1.79 (2.23) F(1/125) = 3.24 0.074 0.03
 Frequency of intrusive sounds/smells 1.13 (1.85) 0.66 (0.94) F(1/125) = 3.26 0.074 0.03
 Worry about intrusive images (% of time) 13.12 (18.28) 4.83 (4.74) F(1/125) = 11.79 0.001 0.09
 Worry about intrusive thoughts (% of time) 7.26 (10.59) 8.85 (11.43) F(1/125) = 0.66 0.418 0.01
 Worry about intrusive sounds/smells (% of time) 4.31 (5.71) 5.83 (8.52) F(1/125) = 1.41 0.238 0.01
 Mental occupation with event/consequences (% of time) 9.21 (8.84) 7.33 (7.04) F(1/125) = 1.74 0.189 0.01
IES-R
 Intrusion 3.22 (3.58) 2.61 (3.03) t(101) = 0.93 0.356 0.18
 Hyperarousal 1.61 (2.61) 2.37 (4.29) t(78) = 1.07 0.289 0.22
 Avoidance 3.91 (4.77) 5.92 (7.27) t(82) = 1.64 0.104 0.33
 Total score 8.74 (9.06) 10.90 (12.33) t(101) = 1.02 0.311 0.20

Note. IMQ = Intrusive Memory Questionnaire; IES-R = Impact of event scale – Revised.