Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep 7;86:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.005

Table 1.

Example clinician performance scores. An observed vs. expected 30-day morality contingency table was constructed for each clinician based on the set of patients they were responsible for in 2010–2013. A patient was counted as “dead” if their death occurred within 30 days of their last recorded admission order. The observed dead (DO) and alive (AO) counts can be deduced directly from admission order and mortality timestamps. The expected dead (DE) and alive (AE) counts are predicted using 30-day mortality probabilities generated by a L1-regularized logistic regression model trained on 2008–2009 patient data. In these examples, Clinician A has a lower O-to-E ratio than Clinician B, but a larger quantity of data that yields more confidence and thus an equivalent final score. Clinicians B and C have the same observed-to-expected mortality ratio, but their scores differ due to varying confidence in the estimate. Higher magnitude scores thus reflect a greater effect size or certainty of deviation from the expected mortality rate.

Observed to Expected Ratio =
DO/DE
Clinician Example A
O-to-E Ratio = 1.5
Score = −0.22
Clinician Example B
O-to-E Ratio = 3
Score = −0.22
Clinician Example C
O-to-E Ratio = 3
Score = −2.89
Observed
Dead (DO)
Observed
Alive (AO)
9 70 3 17 30 170
Expected
Dead (DE)
Expected
Alive (AE)
6 73 1 19 10 190