Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;6:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2018.10.009

Table 3.

Performance of VIA examination and HPV Xpert test algorithms for detection of high-grade disease.

Screening Algorithm High-Grade Disease
Percentage %
Positive n (%) Negative n (%) Sensitivity [95% CI] Specificity [95% CI] PPV [95% CI] NPV [95% CI]
Algorithm 1
(n = 462)
POSITIVE VIA + 17 (3.7) 80 (17.3) 51.5
[33.5–69.2]
81.4
[77.3–84.9]
17.5
[10.6–26.6]
95.6
[93.0–97.5]
NEGATIVE VIA - 16 (3.5) 349 (75.5)
Algorithm 2
(n = 527)
POSITIVE Any hrHPV +
(hrHPV test on self-collected specimen)
33 (6.3) 64 (12.1) 91.7
[77.5–98.2]
87.0
[83.7–89.8]
34.0
[24.7–44.3]
99.3
[98.0–99.9]
NEGATIVE Any hrHPV –
(hrHPV test on self-collected specimen)
3 (0.6) 427 (81.0)
Algorithm 3
(n = 529)
POSITIVE Any hrHPV +
(hrHPV test on clinician-collected specimen)
33 (6.2) 48 (9.1) 91.7
[77.5–98.2]
90.3
[87.3–92.7]
40.7
[29.9–52.2]
99.3
[98.1–99.9]
NEGATIVE Any hrHPV –
(hrHPV test on clinician-collected specimen)
3 (0.6) 445 (84.1)
Algorithm 4
(n = 515)
POSITIVE Any hrHPV + and VIA +
(hrHPV test on self-collected specimen)
15 (2.9) 18 (3.5) 45.5
[28.1–63.6]
96.3
[94.2–97.8]
45.5
[28.1–63.6]
96.3
[94.2–97.8]
NEGATIVE Any hrHPV – or
Any hrHPV + and VIA -
(hrHPV test on self-collected specimen)
18 (3.5) 464 (90.1)

Algorithm 1 versus Algorithm 2; sensitivity p < 0.01, specificity p = 0.02, PPV p < 0.01, NPV p < 0.01.

Algorithm 1 versus algorithm 3; sensitivity p < 0.01, specificity p < 0.01, PPV p < 0.01, NPV p < 0.01.

Algorithm 1 versus algorithm 4; sensitivity p = 0.62, specificity p < 0.01, PPV p < 0.01, NPV p = 0.63.

Algorithm 2 versus algorithm 4; sensitivity p < 0.01, specificity p < 0.01, PPV p = 0.24, NPV p < 0.01.