Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 18;108(5):1121–1128. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy213

TABLE 3.

Estimated risk of T2D [ORs (95% CI)] by combined egg and meat consumption1

Egg intake
Meat intake, g/d Cases/total2 0 eggs 1–3 eggs/mo 1–4 eggs/wk ≥5 eggs/wk P-trend3
0 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.88, 1.24) 1.05 (0.89, 1.23) 1.52 (1.09, 2.12)* 0.745
517/14,619 (349/12,039) (84/1687) (63/691) (21/202)
>0 to <25 1.26 (0.98, 1.62) 1.43 (1.20, 1.71)* 1.37 (1.16, 1.61)* 1.39 (1.02, 1.91)* 0.438
653/13,475 (238/6856) (251/4138) (115/1906) (49/575)
≥25 to <70 2.12 (1.57, 2.87)* 1.33 (1.05, 1.68)* 1.55 (1.29, 1.86)* 1.65 (1.22, 2.22)* 0.597
1213/21,981 (317/8481) (421/7236) (337/4707) (138/1557)
≥70 2.22 (1.35, 3.65)* 1.83 (1.30, 2.58)* 1.75 (1.38, 2.21)* 1.77 (1.22, 2.57)* 0.598
211/2643 (47/717) (55/791) (68/755) (41/380)
P-trend3 <0.0001 0.007 <0.0001 0.396

1ORs were estimated using logistic regression model including meat and egg intakes and their interaction, adjusting for age, gender, energy, television hours, sleep hours, smoking, exercise, BMI, and intakes of refined grains, vegetables, soy, fruits, dairy, coffee, fish, and nuts/seeds. *P ≤ 0.01; interaction between egg and meat intake was significant (P = 0.019). T2D, type 2 diabetes.

2 n = 52,718 (cases = 2594).

3Marginal trend P values obtained from stratified analysis.