Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;18(Suppl 1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1295-4

Table 4.

Validation of Tsetse species from field collected samples using Glossina ITS1

graphic file with name 12866_2018_1295_Tab4_HTML.jpg

In grey scale: field collections lacking reference laboratory populations

aBased on the ITS1 profile, non-amplification of microsatellite A10, complete absence of the cytoplasmic infection of Wolbachia, and the geographical distribution of tsetse species, these 7 samples were identified as G. m. submorsitans

bBased on the ITS1 profile, amplification pattern of both A10 and Gmm14 microsatellite markers, absence of cytoplasmic and chromosomal Wolbachia, and the geographic distribution of tsetse species, these individuals were identified as G. tachinoides

cBased on the ITS1 profile, amplification of both A10 and Gmm14 microsatellite, absence of cytoplasmic and chromosomal Wolbachia, and the geographic distribution of tsetse species, these individuals were identified as G. m. submorsitans

dBased on the ITS1 profile, COI profile, amplification pattern of both A10 and Gmm14 microsatellite markers, absence of cytoplasmic and chromosomal Wolbachia, and the geographic distribution of tsetse species, these individuals were identified as G. pallidipes

eFor G. swynnertoni, there was no ITS1 amplicon expected from previous studies. The one generated in the present study is stated as ‘expected’