Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;18:176. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0740-3

Table 6.

Diagnostic performance of different marker combinations (n = 132)

Cut-off value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) +LR −LR PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Emp vs. other
 Presepsin, 754 pg/mL + CRP, 4.91 mg/dL 63.6 93.4 9.63 0.39 46.7 96.6 90.9
 Presepsin, 754 pg/mL + PCT, ≤ 2.57 ng/mL 90.9 78.5 4.23 0.12 27.8 99.0 79.6
 CRP, 4.91 mg/dL + PCT, ≤ 2.57 ng/mL 63.6 90.1 6.42 0.40 36.8 96.5 87.9
PE vs. other (excluding Emp)
 Presepsin, 680 pg/mL + CRP, 2.18 mg/dL 68.8 93.3 10.31 0.33 61.1 95.1 90.1
 Presepsin, 680 pg/mL + PCT, 0.13 ng/mL 68.8 90.5 7.22 0.35 52.4 95.0 87.6
 CRP, 2.18 mg/dL + PCT, 0.13 ng/mL 68.8 92.4 9.02 0.34 57.9 95.1 89.3
Infectious vs. non-infectious
 Presepsin, 680 pg/mL + CRP, 2.59 mg/dL 65.8 90.4 6.87 0.38 73.5 86.7 83.3
 Presepsin, 680 pg/mL + PCT, 0.11 ng/mL 55.3 89.4 5.19 0.50 67.7 83.2 79.6
 CRP, 2.59 mg/dL + PCT, 0.11 ng/mL 50.0 92.6 6.71 0.54 73.1 82.1 80.3

Emp empyema, PE parapneumonic effusions, +LR positive likelihood ratio, −LR negative likelihood ratio, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value