Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2018 May 1;101:136–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.04.002

Table 5. Binomial Effect Size Displays for the use of labels in Experiment 3 and practicing in Experiment 4. The numbers represent the number of participants out of 100 expected to improve by using labels and practicing.

Labeled Relations (Expt. 3)
d = .513; r = .2341 Improved Not Improved
 Used Labels (+practiced) 62 38
 Did Nothing 38 62
Practiced without labels (Expt. 4)
d = .185; r = .0865 Improved Not Improved
 Practiced without labels 54 46
 Did Nothing 46 54