Table III.
Significant Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses
| 95% CI for odds ratio |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | Lower | Odds ratio | Upper | |
| Time 1 Bowel Management | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 3 | ||||
| Family cohesion 3.60 (1.78)* 1.13 36.54 1185.29 (Parent report) | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 4 | ||||
| BRIEF | 4.99 (1.66)** | 5.75 | 147.58 | 3788.80 |
| Family stress | 1.59 (0.81)* | 1.01 | 4.90 | 23.81 |
| Time 1 Catheterization | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 2 | ||||
| Gross motor functioning classification | 0.67 (0.34)* | 1.01 | 1.96 | 3.80 |
| Time 2 Bowel Management | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 2 | ||||
| Gross motor functioning classification | 0.74 (0.36)* | 1.02 | 2.09 | 4.25 |
| IQ | −0.06 (0.02)* | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.99 |
| Peer conflict | 1.80 (0.85)* | 1.14 | 6.02 | 31.68 |
| Group 1 vs. Group 3 | ||||
| Emotional support 1.63 (0.81)* 1.04 5.10 25.11 from peers | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 4 | ||||
| BRIEF | 3.14 (1.26)* | 1.97 | 23.20 | 273.11 |
| Family stress | 1.88 (0.87)* | 1.18 | 6.53 | 36.10 |
| Time 2 Catheterization | ||||
| Group 1 vs. Group 2 | ||||
| Gross motor functioning classification | 0.75 (0.36)* | 1.05 | 2.11 | 4.24 |
| Group 1 vs. Group 3 | ||||
| Family cohesion (observed) | 3.04 (1.47)* | 1.18 | 20.82 | 367.13 |
Note. *p < .05; **p < .01; Group 1 (“Adherent, Child Responsible”) is the reference group; Group 2 = “Adherent, Child Not Responsible”; Group 3 = ”Nonadherent, Child Responsible”); Group 4 = “Nonadherent, Child Not Responsible.”