TABLE 3.
Association between the DII and healthy aging in the SU.VI.MAX study (n = 2796)1
| Tertile 1DII | Tertile 2DII | Tertile 3DII | DII | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 932) | (n = 932) | (n = 932) | P-trend2 | (continuous) | P-continuous | |
| Model 13 | 1 (–) | 1.04 (0.93, 1.17) | 0.87 (0.77, 1.00) | 0.04 | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | 0.21 |
| Model 24 | 1 (–) | 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) | 0.85 (0.74, 0.99) | 0.03 | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | 0.17 |
| Model 35 | 1 (–) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) | 0.86 (0.74, 0.99) | 0.04 | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | 0.19 |
1
Values are RRs (95% CIs), estimated through robust-error-term Poisson regression models. DII, Dietary Inflammatory Index; SU.VI.MAX, Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants.
2
P for trend obtained by contrast.
3
Model 1 is adjusted for sex, supplementation group, age, follow-up duration.
4
Model 2 is adjusted as for Model 1 + number of 24-h records, daily energy intake, education level, occupational status, living arrangement, smoking status, and physical activity.
5
Model 3 is adjusted as for Model 2 + BMI.