Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):54–60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx111

Table 1.

AUCs of the raw feature x, the normalized feature z, the PheNorm scores using SAFE feature for denoising with a dropout rate of 0.3, PheNormvote, the supervised algorithms trained with SAFE features with N = 100, 200, or 300 labels, as well as the XPRESS and Anchor algorithms.

CAD RA CD UC
xICD 0.844 0.868 0.824 0.812 Comparison is with the previous step; asterisk indicates positive increment at the significance level of 0.05.
zICD 0.8750.0100.031* 0.9010.0080.033* 0.8770.0130.053* 0.8590.0120.047*
PheNormICD 0.8990.0040.024* 0.9290.0090.028* 0.9110.0050.033* 0.9000.0050.041*

xNLP 0.840 0.898 0.906 0.904
zNLP 0.8640.0110.025* 0.9230.0110.025* 0.9470.0070.041* 0.9310.0060.026*
PheNormNLP 0.8840.0030.019* 0.9370.0050.014* 0.9480.0040.001 0.9350.0020.004*

xICDNLP 0.865 0.903 0.902 0.901
zICDNLP 0.8950.0080.030* 0.9350.0090.032* 0.9440.0080.042* 0.9330.0070.032*
PheNormICDNLP 0.8990.0020.004* 0.9360.0020.001 0.9450.0020.001 0.9350.0020.002

PheNormvote 0.899 0.937 0.945 0.933

100 labels 0.9020.0130.003 0.9240.0120.012 0.9380.0080.007 0.9410.0100.006 Comparison is with PheNormICDNLP; asterisk indicates difference at the significance level of 0.05.
200 labels 0.9100.0130.011 0.9330.0140.003 0.9410.0090.004 0.9460.0100.011
300 labels 0.9130.0150.014 0.9350.0180.000 0.9430.0110.002 0.9460.0120.012

XPRESS 0.8360.0120.063* 0.8960.0120.040* 0.9050.0090.039* 0.9130.0080.022*

Anchor 0.8630.0400.035* 0.8900.0170.045* 0.8950.0140.050* 0.8660.0170.069*

Comparisons are shown in the form AUCse(ΔAUC)ΔAUC, where the superscript is the increment in AUC and the subscript is the standard error of the difference in AUC.