Table 5.
Chemical compound classification of antibacterial activity against Las bacterium.
| Variables | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scion survival (%) | 67.92 ± 16.22ab | 72.85 ± 12.85a | 80.98 ± 20.92a |
| Scion grown rate (%) | 25.55 ± 12.72a | 30.39 ± 13.31a | 40.62 ± 22.58a |
| Scion infected (%) | 23.06 ± 21.01c | 41.27 ± 7.71b | 68.29 ± 16.65a |
| Las transmission (%) | 21.7 ± 13.97c | 35.73 ± 14.28b | 77.19 ± 16.28a |
| Ct value in scion | 36.36 ± 1.71a | 33.31 ± 1.57b | 28.9 ± 2.66c |
| Ct value in rootstock | 36.32 ± 2.18a | 33.79 ± 1.5b | 27.14 ± 2.65c |
| Disease index | 18.42 ± 9.25c | 33.16 ± 9.3b | 49.24 ± 17.45a |
| Compounds included | AL, BSO, NIC, SC, SFC, SD, EBI-601, EBI-602, Amp | BITC, CARV, QUI, PDL, PCY, PLA, SN, SDN, 80WG, SAR | 2AC, MET, AZA, BER, ABC, FA, HYD, INH, CRE, MESO, QUAD, SAP, THU, ZINEB, 20WP, Proud, EcoClean, NS, PT81, FT33, MA, DMSO, CK-1, CK-2 |
| Group Classification | Highly effective | Partly effective | Non-effective |
bDifferent letter by group indicated that the significance at 0.05 level.