Table 1:
NS | HS | LS | Sacc | SolCarb® | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fat Depot weights (g) | |||||
Inguinal | 7.24 ± 0.50 | 7.41 ± 0.72 | 7.96 ± 0.38 | 7.38 ± 0.57 | 8.16 ± 0.69 |
Epididymal | 4.44 ± 0.25 | 5.04 ± 0.52 | 5.07 ± 0.39 | 4.75 ± 0.25 | 5.29 ± 0.41 |
Retroperitoneal | 2.91 ± 0.31 | 2.83 ± 0.29 | 3.49 ± 0.27 | 2.83 ± 0.41 | 3.59 ± 0.41 |
Mesenteric | 2.18 ± 0.16A | 1.95 ± 0.26A | 2.74 ± 0.29AB | 2.12 ± 0.20A | 3.08 ± 0.30B |
Liver | |||||
Weight (g) | 12.23 ± 0.21 | 13.76 ± 0.50 | 14.36 ± 0.48 | 13.08 ± 0.44 | 14.13 ± 0.66 |
Lipid (mg) | 477 ± 25 | 443 ± 16 | 439 ± 38 | 477 ± 21 | 461 ± 22 |
Glycogen (mg glucose) | 730 ± 50 | 734 ± 27 | 734 ± 27 | 780 ± 37 | 776 ± 30 |
Body Composition (g/rat) | |||||
Carcass wt. | 345 ± 6 | 346 ± 6 | 357 ± 10 | 350 ± 6 | 353 ± 8 |
Carcass Fat | 30 ± 2 | 32 ± 3 | 36 ± 2 | 29 ± 3 | 37 ± 3 |
Carcass Ash | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 15.5 ± 0.3 | 14.3 ± 0.8 | 16.6 ± 1.10 | 15.5 ± 0.8 |
Lean Mass | 300 ± 6 | 298 ± 4 | 307 ± 8 | 304 ± 4 | 301 ± 6 |
Serum Assays | |||||
Leptin (ng/ml) | 7.1 ± 1.5 | 6.6 ± 2.0 | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 8.3 ± 2.2 |
Insulin (ng/ml) | 0.42 ± 0.11 | 0.62 ± 0.13 | 0.81 ± 0.21 | 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.36 ± 0.04 |
Glucose mg/dL) | 164 ± 11 | 154 ± 15 | 161 ± 13 | 155 ± 10 | 137 ± 6 |
FFA (mEq/L) | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.05 |
Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 165 ± 24 | 168 ± 15 | 185 ± 19 | 149 ± 16 | 155 ± 21 |
Data are means ± SE for groups of 8 rats fed different diets for 38 days. There were no significant differences in any of the parameters measured when compared by one-way analysis of variance, except for mesenteric fatt which was significantly larger in SolCarb® than NS, HS or Sacc rats (P<0.05, determined by post-hoc Duncan’s Multiple Range test).