Table 1.
Substrate | Terminal C | Relative Joining efficiency# | % Direct ligation | Ligation Stimulation+ |
---|---|---|---|---|
--GC [-- | deoxyC | 1 | 87 ± 6 | 1 |
--] CG-- | (ribo)C | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 92 ± 1 | 1.3 |
deoxyC | 1 | 19 ± 8 | 1 | |
--GAC [-- | (ribo)C | 5.8 ± 1.9 | 88 ± 6 | 26 |
--] AG-- | 2’fluoroC | 5.4 ± 3.9 | 88 ± 1 | 25 |
arabinoC | 1.1 ± 0.6 | < 2* | < 0.1* | |
--GACGC [-- | deoxyC | 1 | 32 ± 3 | 1 |
--] GCAG-- | (ribo)C | 6.3 ± 3.1 | 88 ± 3 | 17 |
--TTTTTTTTGC [-- | deoxyC | 1 | 4 ± 1 | 1 |
--] G-- | (ribo)C | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 64 ± 5 | 48 |
Joining efficiency rC/joining efficiency dC, as measured by qPCR that amplifies all NHEJ products.
Direct ligation product was undetectable
Ligation stimulation=Relative joining efficiency multiplied by %Direct ligation rC/%Direct ligation dC