Table 2.
Comparison of the Position of the Tibial and Femoral Tunnels between the Two Groups
| Characteristic | MA group (n=26) | WA group (n=26) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tibial tunnel | |||
| AM bundle | |||
| AP (%) | 31.6±2.3 | 35.2±4.5 | <0.01a) |
| ML (%) | 44.0±1.4 | 46.8±1.7 | <0.01a) |
| PL bundle | |||
| AP (%) | 47.6±3.2 | 48.7±2.3 | 0.10 |
| ML (%) | 44.1±1.7 | 46.1±1.5 | <0.01a) |
| Femoral tunnel | |||
| AM bundle | |||
| High-low | 23.7±1.7 | 23.9±2.0 | 0.71 |
| Deep-shallow | 22.9±1.9 | 23.5±2.7 | 0.50 |
| PL bundle | |||
| High-low | 51.2±1.8 | 50.1±2.4 | 0.16 |
| Deep-shallow | 32.3±1.9 | 31.5±2.4 | 0.23 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
MA: minimal ablation, WA: wide ablation, AM: anteromedial, AP: anteroposterior, ML: mediolateral, PL: posterolateral.
a)
p<0.05.