Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 7;115(47):E11101–E11110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807256115

Table 1.

Stratified Cox regression analysis of ML, overall CNA, DNA burden, and dN/dS in different cancer groups

OS DFS
Variables (Set) Βeta (SE) P value Βeta (SE) P value
ML, all −1.63 (1.16) 0.1621 −1.14 (1.00) 0.2575
ML, L 3.48 (1.46) 0.017 2.81 (0.89) 0.0015
ML, H 4.79 (1.73) 0.0057 4.18 (1.73) 0.0155
CNA, all 0.9 (0.19) 2e-6 1 (0.2) 7.3e-7
CNA, L 1.98 (0.31) 2e-9 1.35 (0.32) 1.8e-5
CNA, H 0.27 (0.22) 0.22 0.21 (0.25) 0.39
Burden, all 0.48 (0.1) 2.5e-6 0.37 (0.11) 6.8e-4
Burden, L 1.17 (0.22) 1.9e-7 0.86 (0.21) 2.9e-5
Burden, H 0.14 (0.15) 0.35 −0.07(0.17) 0.71
dN/dS, all −0.5 (0.4) 0.21 −0.12 (0.39) 0.76
dN/dS, L −0.62 (0.55) 0.26 −0.54 (0.53) 0.31
dN/dS, H 0.48 (0.58) 0.41 1.08 (0.68) 0.11

For each tested variable, the estimated scaling coefficient β (i.e., HR = eβ), its SE,and the corresponding P value of the stratified Cox regression model are shown for OS and DFS. Statistically significant trends are indicated by bold type. Cancer groups (L, H) correspond to the low-ML (#1–8) and high-ML (#16–23) cancer types (Fig. 1). In each test/group, variables are normalized to 0–1 and are stratified by the cancer type (Methods).