Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;9(12):1161. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1203-8

Table 1.

Analyses of genome profiles generated by OEhMSCs cultured in the RWV on beads coated with OEhMSC-derived ECM as compared to collagen I

A
Gene ontology
Term P-value Enrichment
Response to mechanical stimulus 1.90E−06 7.4
Integrin binding 2.90E−04 4.2
Cellular response to hypoxia 7.00E−04 4.1
Positive regulation of cell migration 2.40E−04 3.2
Positive regulation of gene expression 1.10E−05 3.2
ECM organization 4.60E−04 3
Proteinaceous ECM 3.80E−05 3
Aging 3.10E−03 2.9
Cell–cell adhesion 1.90E−04 2.8
Cadherin binding involved in cell–cell adhesion 1.30E−04 2.8
Heparin binding 6.90E−03 2.8
ECM 1.40E−04 2.7
Mitochondrial outer membrane 1.10E−02 2.7
Angiogenesis 1.60E−03 2.7
Focal adhesion 4.10E−05 2.6
B
Tissue expression
Term P -value Enrichment
Bonea 1.40E−08 4
Bone marrowb 8.40E−11 3.9
Ovary 3.30E−10 3.7
Eye 2.10E−08 3.7
Brain 1.80E−09 3.7
Lung 9.40E−08 3.4
Eye 4.70E−10 3.3
Vascular 1.90E−05 2.5
Thyroid 2.10E−04 2.3

a,b refer to Table S2 and 3, respectively

A list of those transcripts with 2-fold greater transcription when hMSCs differentiated to OEhMSCs on ECM as compared to on collagen I was subjected to analysis using the DAVID database. A: Gene ontology clustering. B: Association with known tissue expression signatures. The definition of P-values and Enrichment Scores are provided in Huang da et al.31,32