Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;9:1994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994

Table 6.

Studies on the impact of cognitive load on voice and speech production.

Study Speech process Subjects Context Task Speech measures Results
Griffin and Williams, 1987 Phonation N = 20 Laboratory Psychomotor tests, increased difficulty. F0 Amplitude in dB Word duration Level 4 caused:
• Level 1 counting from 1 to 10 for 10 times. • Significantly increased F0 (106.95–118.91 Hz)
• Level 2: psychomotor test (PMT) while counting 0–9. • Increased intensity (49.38–57.12 dB).
• Level 3: simple dichotic listening task (DLT) with vocalized responses. • Decreased word duration (384.81–338.80 ms).
• Level 4: combined DLT-PMT task.
Hecker et al., 1968 Phonation N = 5 Laboratory Time-constraints in a read-aloud calculation task. F0 Mixed results: increased and decreased F0-patterns.
Huttunen et al., 2011 Phonation N = 13 Simulation flight Flight simulation task with three levels of cognitive load: situation awareness, information processing and decision making. F0 F0 range amplitude • Increased F0 and amplitude in function of cognitive load.
• Decreased F0 range.
Kurniawan et al., 2013 Phonation Not mentioned – model testing laboratory • BL: questionnaire and 10 min relaxation. F0 prediction models No reliable predictive models in F0.
• Low cognitive load: Stroop-Word congruent color test and easy mental-math test. Voice stress is an individual dependent factor.
• High cognitive load: Stroop-Word incongruent color test and hard mental-math tests.
Johannes et al., 2007 Phonation N = 11 Laboratory Psychomotor tests: time pressure, problem solving test, sensorimotor coordination and a handgrip physical strength test) with alternated relaxation (nature images with composed music). F0 • Increased F0 in time pressure and problem solving tasks.
Rothkrantz et al., 2004 Breathing Phonation N = 108 Laboratory Stroop-task with increased difficulty: shortening the time between the appearances of the presentation of the matched and non-matched color-word sample every minute with half a second. F0 Jitter Duration • Significant increased F0 (114.28–122.20 Hz) and F0-variation (7.36–10.11 Hz).
• Significant decreased jitter (1.24–0.94%).
• Significant decrease in jitter (1.24–0.94%).
• High frequency energy more present in longer time-slots.
• Decreased utterance duration.
Ruiz et al., 1996 Phonation N = 1 Laboratory Stroop-task. F0 Formants F1, F2, F3 • Significant increase in F0 (127–164.8 Hz with a maximal peak value of 250 Hz).
• Impact on formants vowel specific.