Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;57(12):2129–2139. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key212

Table 3.

Nested case–control study to assess the association between ULT use and TJR among patients with gout

Use of uric acid drugs Taiwan cohort UK cohort
THR, adjusted OR (95% CI) TKR, adjusted OR (95% CI) TJR, adjusted OR (95% CI) THR, adjusted OR (95% CI) TKR, adjusted OR (95% CI) TJR, adjusted OR (95% CI)
Xanthine oxidase inhibitors
    <28 cDDD 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    28–≤90 cDDD 1.03 (0.74, 1.44) 1.06 (0.75, 1.50) 1.06 (0.83, 1.34) 1.13 (0.82, 1.56) 0.93 (0.62, 1.40) 1.09 (0.83, 1.42)
    91–≤180 cDDD 0.92 (0.52, 1.62) 0.91 (0.54, 1.52) 1.02 (0.70, 1.50) 1.36 (0.92, 2.02) 0.69 (0.43, 1.11) 0.93 (0.68, 1.27)
    >180 cDDD 1.27 (0.74, 2.20) 0.75 (0.43, 1.33) 1.25 (0.83, 1.88) 1.02 (0.85, 1.22) 1.01 (0.83, 1.22) 1.08 (0.94, 1.24)
    P for trend 0.57 0.42 0.31 0.59 0.88 0.34
Uricosuric agentsa
    <28 cDDD 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) NA NA NA
    28–≤90 cDDD 0.91 (0.73, 1.13) 0.97 (0.78, 1.20) 0.89 (0.77, 1.04) NA NA NA
    91–≤180 cDDD 0.98 (0.73, 1.30) 0.95 (0.70, 1.27) 1.00 (0.81, 1.23) NA NA NA
    >180 cDDD 0.96 (0.73, 1.27) 1.16 (0.89, 1.52) 1.04 (0.86, 1.26) NA NA NA
    P for trend 0.67 0.48 0.93 NA NA NA
Urate-lowering therapy
    <28 cDDD 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) NA NA NA
    28–≤90 cDDD 0.89 (0.72, 1.10) 0.98 (0.79, 1.20) 0.89 (0.77, 1.03) NA NA NA
    91–≤180 cDDD 0.99 (0.76, 1.30) 1.03 (0.79, 1.35) 1.03 (0.85, 1.24) NA NA NA
    >180 cDDD 1.04 (0.81, 1.33) 1.09 (0.85, 1.40) 1.12 (0.94, 1.34) NA NA NA
    P for trend 0.91 0.53 0.36 NA NA NA
a

ORs and 95% CIs estimated by conditional logistic regression analysis and adjusted for socio-economic status, Charlson co-morbidity index, co-morbidities and co-medications in the Taiwan cohort and Charlson co-morbidity index, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, co-morbidities and co-medications in the UK cohort.

*P < 0.05.