Table 2.
Respondent (R) | User activity | Gender | Caregiver relationship | Age | Years of caring | Hours of caring per week |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | High | Female | Daughter | 54 | 5 | 12 |
2 | High | Female | Grand-daughter | 26 | 6 | 30 |
3 | Low | Female | Daughter | 49 | 4 | 10 |
4 | High | Male | Spouse | 59 | 9 | 85 |
5 | High | Male | Spouse | 63 | 4 | 14 |
6 | Low | Female | Daughter in law | 60 | 0.5 | 3 |
7 | Low | Male | Spouse | 71 | 6 | 1.5 |
8 | Low | Male | Son | 64 | 6 | 12 |
9 | High | Female | Daughter | 59 | 3 | 20 |
10 | Low | Female | Daughter | 62 | 7 | 12 |
A sub-sample that completed the 16-week follow-up measurement (T2) was selected to participate in the interviews by a randomization procedure stratified by user activity and gender. Classification of high and low user activity in the intervention group was based on a mean split of the total clicks on the Inlife platform after 16 weeks (mean = 1617).