Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 15;1(2):e180237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0237

Table 3. Trends in Percentage of US Adults Having Poor, Intermediate, and Ideal Diet by SNAP Participation Status, 2003-2014a.

Diet Scores Weighted Survey Results, % (95% CI) P Value for Trend Change in % From 2003-2004 to 2013-2014 (95% CI)
2003-2004 (n = 4066) 2005-2006 (n = 4030) 2007-2008 (n = 4654) 2009-2010 (n = 4996) 2011-2012 (n = 4288) 2013-2014 (n = 4437)
Poor Diet (AHA Diet Score <32.0)
SNAP participants 53.9 (43.8-63.8) 55.6 (46.0-64.8) 56.8 (50.8-62.6) 47.7 (42.4-53.0) 45.4 (41.1-49.6) 53.5 (46.9-59.9) .26 −0.5 (−12.4 to 11.4)
Income-eligible nonparticipants 42.9 (38.2-47.6) 39.4 (32.3-46.9) 41.9 (34.5-49.8) 37.7 (32.8-43.0) 37.2 (31.4-43.5) 38.0 (33.2-43.0) .13 −4.9 (−11.6 to 1.9)
Higher-income individuals 39.5 (35.9-43.3) 39.6 (35.8-43.6) 36.7 (31.9-41.7) 32.5 (30.0-35.1) 27.4 (24.2-30.9) 28.7 (26.4-31.1) <.001 −10.8 (−15.2 to −6.5)
P value for interaction .006b .06c
Intermediate Diet (AHA Diet Score = 32.0-63.9)
SNAP participants 45.7 (35.9-55.8) 44.1 (34.9-53.7) 42.9 (37.1-49.0) 51.7 (46.7-56.7) 53.7 (49.6-57.8) 45.3 (39.0-51.7) .35 −0.4 (−12.2 to 11.3)
Income-eligible nonparticipants 56.3 (51.5-61.0) 60.5 (53.0-67.6) 55.9 (49.1-62.6) 61.1 (56.1-65.8) 62.0 (56.0-67.6) 59.8 (54.8-64.6) .23 3.5 (−3.3 to 10.3)
Higher-income individuals 59.1 (55.4-62.7) 58.6 (54.7-62.3) 61.9 (57.0-66.7) 65.0 (62.4-67.5) 70.1 (67.0-72.9) 68.7 (66.3-71.0) <.001 9.6 (5.3-13.9)
P value for interaction .008b .05c
Ideal Diet (AHA Diet Score ≥64.0)
SNAP participants 0.3 (0-2.2) 0.3 (0-2.1) 0.3 (0.1-0.9) 0.6 (0.2-1.8) 0.9 (0.5-1.7) 1.3 (0.5-3.3) .07 0.9 (−0.4 to 2.3)
Income-eligible nonparticipants 0.8 (0.3-2.7) 0.1 (0-0.4) 2.1 (0.9-4.9) 1.2 (0.5-3.0) 0.8 (0.3-1.7) 2.2 (1.1-4.4) .11 1.4 (−0.4 to 3.2)
Higher-income individuals 1.4 (0.8-2.3) 1.8 (1.1-2.8) 1.4 (0.9-2.0) 2.5 (1.8-3.5) 2.5 (1.6-3.9) 2.6 (2.0-3.4) .01 1.2 (0.3-2.2)
P value for interaction .38b .61c

Abbreviations: AHA, American Heart Association; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

a

For each continuous score, cut points were defined to correspond to the AHA binary dietary component scoring system. A poor diet was defined as being less than 40% adherence (<32 points). An intermediate diet was defined as adherence to 40% to 79.9% (32.0-63.9 points). An ideal diet was defined as 80% adherence or greater (≥64 points).

b

P value for interaction for potential heterogeneous trends in percentage of respondents having ideal, intermediate, and poor diet by SNAP participation status.

c

P value for interaction for potential heterogeneous changes in percentage of respondents having ideal, intermediate, and poor diet by SNAP participation status.