Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;18:151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7

Table 3.

Meta-analytic regression results between retention strategy themes and retention rate

Estimate CI (Lower - Upper) P I2
Model 1: Continuous total number of retention strategy types 99.86%
 Barriers 0.17 0.03–0.32 0.02*
 Community −0.03 − 0.18 - 0.11 0.63
 Follow-up/reminder −0.15 −0.29 - -0.01 0.04*
 Tracing 0.11 −0.06 - 0.27 0.22
 Study duration −0.04 −0.08 - 0.00 0.06
 Number of waves 0.00 −0.02 - 0.03 0.81
Model 2: Binary usage of retention strategy types 99.84%
 Barriers 0.35 −0.15 - 0.86 0.16
 Community 0.35 −0.14 - 0.83 0.16
 Follow-up/reminder −0.83 −1.40 - -0.27 0.00**
 Tracing 0.11 −0.36 - 0.59 0.64
 Study duration −0.03 −0.08 - 0.01 0.10
 Number of waves 0.01 −0.02 - 0.03 0.61
Model 3: All individual strategies with p < 0.1 99.85%
 Tracing - Locator form documentation 0.59 −0.44 - 1.62 0.26
 Follow-up - Reminder Phone call −0.72 −1.20 - -0.25 0.00**
 Community - Thank you and birthday cards 0.44 −0.11 - 0.98 0.12
 Barriers - Site and home visits 0.42 −0.05 - 0.88 0.08
 Barriers - Consistency in research staff 0.39 −0.42 - 1.20 0.34
 Barriers - Alternative method of data collection 0.59 0.14–1.05 0.01**
 Study duration −0.04 − 0.08 - − 0.00 0.05*
 Number of waves -0.00 −0.03 - 0.02 0.89

*p < .05

**p < .01